View Paper

The Cognitive Developmental Levels of a sample of First Year University Science Students

Author Lorraine McCormack, Odilla E. Finlayson, Thomas J.J. McCloughlin
Abstract The purpose of this study was to gauge the cognitive developmental levels of first year university science students. The sample consisted of 386 third-level students, with an average age of 18.8 years. The sample was comprised of two first year groups of students, from nine undergraduate science courses. The task used to measure the cognitive developmental levels was one of the Science Reasoning Tasks, developed by the CSMS (Concepts in Secondary Mathematics and Science) team. The profile obtained showed that almost 70 per cent of students were at levels capable of formal operational thought. However, only a very small minority showed capability of late formal operational thought, necessary for meaningful engagement and understanding of many scientific and mathematical concepts. Thirty-two per cent of the university cohort was at concrete levels of cognitive development. A statistically significant gender difference was evident in this study with female students lagging behind male students in this sample, in terms of their cognitive developmental levels. The significance of these results is evident when the students' current cognitive levels are compared with the minimum cognitive level that a student should be at, in order to understand a large amount of scientific and mathematical concepts in second and third level education. More detailed analysis of these results and the implications for third level science education are presented.
Published In ICEP Proceedings
Year 2010
Link PDF

“Can You Hear Me Now?” Insights from Blended Learning Teachers. [View Paper] Ronan Lynch and Bernadette Brereton.

Interprofessional education: International perspectives on the delivery of research methods modules. [View Paper] Roisin Cahalan, Mary Fitzpatrick and Pauline Boland.

Thinking with your Hands: A Constructionist Perspective on Design Pedagogy. [View Paper] Alan Ryan.

Reflections on ‘Promoting Academic Integrity Week,’ [View Paper] Rob Lowney and Fiona O’Riordan.

Engaging pedagogy through the use of an Integrated Case study in Business Education.[View Paper] Sharon McGreevy, Siobhan Gallagher and Conor Heagney.

Collaborative learning spaces to support engaged pedagogy. [View Paper] Ciara McCaffrey.

Mindfulness in the Educational System: To Be or Not to Be?[View Paper] Maria Kenneally.

The role of assessment literacy in encouraging students to choose alternative assessment mode. [View Paper] Emma O Brien, Karen Ni Chlochasaigh and Tj O’Ceallaigh.

Using the UDL framework to take account of student diversity when developing summative assessment in a large class context: Reflections of a higher education teacher educator. [View Paper] Ann Marie Farrell.

Developing Digital Capabilities in Further Education and Training: Learning Through Inquiry. [View Paper] Yvonne Emmett and Michael Goldrick.

Changing Speed How First Year Students learn to learn in the Design Studio. [View Paper] Morgan Flynn, Jan Frohburg, Anna Ryan and Declan Feeney.

Teaching as Response, Responsibility, and Response-ability.[View Paper] Yvonne Emmett and Sheena Hyland.

Succeed together, fail together? Exploring individual and group assessment at final year undergraduate level. [View Paper] Carol Moran.

Beacons and Novice Programming Comprehension. [View Paper] Mark Noone and Aidan Mooney.

Conceptions of student-staff partnership among academics at Mary Immaculate College, Limerick, in relation to the research teaching nexus. [View Paper] Paul Collins.

Peeling the Onion: Critical Reflection within a Community of Practice, [View Paper] Kathleen Horgan, Fionnuala Tynan, Anne O’ Byrne and Martin O’ Connor.

Academic Development Provision: Impact and Sustainability Challenges. [View Paper] Fiona O’Riordan.

Embedding self- and peer-assessment in an undergraduate generic skills module. [View Paper] Laura Costelloe.

Case Study on the HECA Academic Quality Enhancement Forum: Collaborative efforts to interpret, adapt and implement the PD Framework. [View Paper] Ruth Ní Bheoláin.

Maynooth University Innovation Lab: Fostering Sustainability in the Higher Education Sector through Design-Thinking – A Practice Paper.
[View Paper] Trevor Vaugh and Threase Kessie.

Mindful Heroes book a resource for engaging pedagogy in HE. [View Paper] Terry Barrett, Vin Harris and Graeme Nixon.

ABC Learning Design Life Hacks. [View Paper] Clare Gormley and Suzanne Stone.

The contribution of online lurking practice to the pedagogical knowledgeability of part-time, external faculty members. [View Paper] Sandra Flynn.

Developing guidelines for the use of WhatsApp as a back channel in Higher Education. [View Paper] Suzanne Stone and Anna Logan.

A Green Approach to Professional Development (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle – getting educational gems to those who need them). [View Paper] Monica Ward.

Rethinking professional development in higher education; Investigating continuing professional development requirements, commitments, activities and perceptions among allied health academic practitioners.
[View Paper] Catherine Norton and Mary Fitzpatrick.

The Educational Ontology of Paulo Freire and the Voice of the Irish Adult Educator. [View Paper] Alex McKillican.

Enhancing Digital Capacity in Teaching and Learning Project: Autumn Semester 2019 Pilot at the University of Limerick – Digital Peer Review Assignments and Student Produced Animated Videos. [View Paper] David Moloney, Reena Cole, David Tanner, Arlene McCurtin and Anne O’Connor.

Educator voices on learning analytics: Exploring staff perspectives on potential, challenges and professional development needs. [View Paper] Catherine Deegan, Geraldine Gray and Pauline Rooney.

Enhancing Digital Capacity in Teaching and Learning in Irish Universities. [View Paper] Sharon Flynn, Julie Byrne, David Hamill, Rob Lowney, Kate Molloy, David Moloney, Morag Munro, Kevin O’Connor, Marian O’Connor, Tom O’Mara and Suzanne Stone.

Acta non verba [Deeds, not words]: A phronetic, multi-stakeholder approach toward transformative and sustainable business education.[View Paper] Jean McCarthy and Brian Shee.

Predicting Student Success, Early on a VTOS Course. [View Paper] Stephen Colgan, Keith Quille, Jelena Vasic and Sean McHugh.

Project-based learning in secondary schools: a precursor to project management in the workplace. [View Paper] Shannette Budhai.